Showing posts with label பொது. Show all posts
Showing posts with label பொது. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

மீண்டும் பிரயாணம் அருணாச்சல பிரதேசத்திற்கு



இன்று குடும்பத்தோடு என் மனைவியின் ஊர் இருக்கும் அருணாச்சல பிரதேசத்திற்கு செல்கிறேன். அவருடைய ஊர் கிழக்கு இமயமலைத் தொடர்ச்சியில் சீனா, திபெத், மியன்மார், இந்தியா ஆகிய நாடுகளின் எல்லைகள் சந்திக்கும் பகுதியில் இருக்கிறது. சென்னையிலிருந்து விமானத்தில் கொல்கத்தா, அங்கிருந்து டிப்ரூகர், பிறகு ஆறு மணி நேரம் மியாவ் என்ற ஊருக்கு சாலை வழி பயணம். அங்கிருந்து அல்லது அருகாமையிலுள்ள வேறு ஊர்களிலிருந்து ராணுவ விமானம் செல்லுமென்றால் (சமீபத்தில் ஹெலிகாப்டர் ஒன்று காணாமல் போனதால் ஹெலிகாப்டர் சிவில் சேவையை நிறுத்தி வைத்திருக்கிறார்கள்) அவர்களிடம் கெஞ்சி கூத்தாடி மலையுச்சியில் இருக்கும் என் துணைவியாரின் கிராமத்திற்கு அருகில் இருக்கும் ராணுவ தளத்திற்குச் செல்லலாம். பிறகு ஒரு நாள் நடந்து சென்று அவருடைய கிராமத்தை அடையலாம். ராணுவ விமானமும் செல்லவில்லையென்றால் ஏழு நாட்கள் மலையேறி அவருடைய கிராமத்தை அடையலாம். குழந்தைகளோடு மலையேற்றம் சாத்தியமில்லை என்பதால் மியாவ் வரை செல்லவே முடியும் என்று நினைக்கிறேன். என் மனைவியின் உறவினர்கள் மிகவும் பிரியமானவர்கள் என்னை அருணாச்சல பிரதேசத்தின் மாப்பிள்ளை என்ற பொருள் வரும்படியான லிசு (என் மனைவியின் தாய்மொழி) வார்த்தையில் அழைப்பார்கள். ஆண்களும் பெண்களுமாய் பிரியத்தைக் கொட்டுவார்கள். ஆகஸ்ட் மாதம் இங்கிலாந்து, போன மாதம் ஜெர்மனி, தவிர தொடர்ச்சியான உள் நாட்டு பயணங்கள் ஆகியவற்றினால் மிகவும் களைப்புற்றிருக்கிறேன் என்றாலும் ஆங்கியோவின் சுற்றத்தாரின் அன்பை நினைத்தே இந்த வருட பிரயாணத்திற்கு சம்மதித்தேன். ஒரு வேளை நாங்கள் மியாவ் வரைதான் செல்ல முடியுமென்றால் ஆங்கியோவின் கிராமமே கீழே இறங்கி வந்து எங்களோடு புத்தாண்டு கொண்டாடுவதாக ஏற்பாடு. என் மகன்கள் முதல் முறையாக அவர்களுடைய அம்மாவின் ஊருக்கு செல்ல்விருப்பதால் மிகவும் உற்சாகமாய் இருக்கிறார்கள். நோடெஹிங் நதியில் மீன் பிடித்தல், இருவாட்சிகளை காட்டில் பின் தொடருதல் என அவர்களுக்கு புதிய விளையாட்டுக்களும் பொழுதுபோக்குகளும் காத்திருக்கின்றன.

என் துணைவியார் ஜப்பானிய லிசு வம்சாவழியினர் அவருடைய இரண்டடுக்கு பர்மிய பாணியிலான வீட்டைச் சுற்றி ருத்திராட்ச மரங்கள் அடர்ந்திருக்கின்றன. மின்சாரமோ, சாலை வசதிகளோ இல்லாத அந்த கிராமத்தில், இமயமலையின் பனிச்சிகரங்களை பால்கனியின் நின்றாவாறு பார்க்க கண் விழிப்பது ஒரு சுகானுபவம்.

ஒவ்வொருமுறை அருணாச்சலத்திற்கு செல்லும்போதும் இல்லை அவர்கள் ஊரிலிருந்து யாரேனும் வரும்போதும் மூட்டை மூட்டையாய் எனக்கு ருத்திராட்சங்கள் கிடைக்கும். இங்கே சென்னையில் எங்கள் வீட்டில் நின்று கல்லூரி படிப்பை முடித்து வேலைக்குப்போன என் மைத்துனன் பாயோ மூளை புற்று நோயால், சிகிக்சை அளித்தும் பயனளிக்காமல், நான் ஜெர்மனியில் இருந்தபோது, அவர்கள் ஊரில் இறந்துபோனார். அந்தத் துயரத்தின் பெரு வளையம் எங்கள் குழந்தைகளை அணுகாமல் ருத்திராட்சங்களும் அவர்களும் பார்த்துக்கொள்வார்கள் என்று என் மாமனார் தொலைபேசியில் சொன்னார். ஆங்கியோவும் அவர் உறவினரும் கிறித்தவர்கள் என்றாலும் எனக்காக என் மாமனார் ருத்திராட்சங்களை குறிப்பிட்ட பண்பும், எங்கள் குழந்தைகளுக்காக தங்கள் துக்கத்தை மறைத்து புத்தாண்டு கொண்டாட்டங்களில்  ஈடுபட ஒரு கிராமமே தயாராக இருப்பதும் ஆதிவாசி சமூகங்களின் இயல்புகள்.  

Thursday, August 13, 2015

The Relevance of Rajaji's vision | Article published in the Times of India


The Times of India features my article on Rajaji in a series of introspective articles exploring Tamilnadu when  the nation is about to celebrate its 68th independence day. The article can be accessed at http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/index.aspx?EID=31807&dt=20150813 on Page 6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Relevance of Rajaji's vision 

Despite his stature and influence, Rajaji never really played a key role at the Centre or in the state government for long. A contrarian whose views were often loudly criticized in his time, Rajaji with his faith in native wisdom offers useful insights for the state, says the author                                                                                                            
By
M D Muthukumaraswamy 

As anti-liquor protests continue in Tamil Nadu, the ageing Rajaji’s historic drive to the residence of the then chief minister M Karunanidhi in August 1971 to plead with him not to lift prohibition has become a talking point. Though Chakravarthy Rajagopalachari failed in his attempt, his ideas on prohibition and other issues are insightful and visionary for the state today. 

Rajmohan Gandhi, in his biography “Rajaji A Life”, records that Rajaji’s political thought is a reflection of his unwavering commitment to and belief in the wisdom of Indian folk culture. Take again Rajaji’s handling of prohibition in TN: In 1931, within three months of Congress taking over, Rajaji implemented it in his own Salem district and announced that prohibition will be gradually extended. 

Despite the revenue loss, Rajaji was able to present a balanced budget in 1937 and also in the two following years. What is more interesting is Rajaji’s vision behind the imposition of dry law. Rajaji thought that alcohol was an assault on Indian folk culture. Rajmohan Gandhi writes, “To CR (Rajaji) the dry law was part of a bigger programme of influencing the countryside. He hoped to popularise games, ballads and bhajan singing, folk dances, street dramas, cinema, and tea and coffee.”

      In fact Rajaji’s every thought had this vision of the modern villager enlightened by the ethos of Indian civilization and the wisdom of folk culture. One reads the explication of his vision in his illuminating retelling of Mahabharata and Ramayana and his commentary on Bhagavad Gita. In a letter to Mahadev Desai, Gandhi’s secretary, he wrote, “ I believe with Bapu that most of our mythological stories are all allegories including the Ramayana and the Mahabharata.” In his introduction to the Ramayana, Rajaji further clarified, “They (the mythologies) are the records of the mind and spirit of our forefathers who cared for the good, ever, ever so much more than for the pleasant and who saw more of the mystery of life than we can in our interminable pursuit of petty and illusory achievements in the material plane.”

      One can see how Rajaji continuously draws the importance of the good over the pleasant and the convenient. This incidentally is also the teachings of the Upanishads, according to Rajaji in his journalistic writings collected together as “Satyameva Jayate”. Rajaji was completely against nuclear weapons and tests and his arguments are comprehensively articulated in the NBT publication, “The Voice of the Uninvolved”. Rajaji was among the first world statesmen to call the US and the then USSR to dismantle their nuclear weapons. 

      Rajaji’s revolt against the Nehruvian brand of socialism and the increasing regimentation of the state was phenomenal. In his hard hitting article, “The case for the Swatantra party” published in “The Illustrated Weekly of India” in August 1969, he wrote, “The party firmly holds that the guarantees specified in the original Constitution in respect of freedom of property, trade, employment and just compensation for any property acquired for public purposes should be restored… It stands for the individual to retain his identity and his motives for honest endeavour, and for his serving the community with a willing heart and not out of compulsion. The 'dharma' of our land and not state management should be the foundation of all our efforts towards prosperity, social justice, welfare and happiness." His statements against the all pervasive presence of the state makes us believe that had Rajaji been alive he would have firmly opposed the Modi government’s introduction of the land acquisition bill and its increasing interference with right to dissent, to argue against dharma-less development and to pursue personal happiness. In a way, Rajaji was an Indian libertarian with a firm faith in native wisdom and traditions, although it must be said that his views on issues covered a vast range and he doesn’t really fit into any one category.

      Rajaji’s thoughts were not without its retrogressive elements. His proposal of “Kula Kalvi” system indirectly tightened the rat trap of the caste system. But his concern was that many of the indigenous knowledge systems were within the bounds of traditional caste families and they need to be transmitted to the next generations for the benefit of the whole society. Compared to the large body of progressive thoughts and ideas Rajaji espoused and propagated, his share of retrogressive ideas was small and insignificant. Rajaji’s pragmatism guided by Indian folk wisdom will guide us in restoring faith not in the state but in the Indian common man, his citizenry, and his ability to be the guiding force of Indian democracy.

Friday, August 7, 2015

Stepping out of the known: The Life and Theatre of Veenapani Chawla | Article published in the Times of India



Thearticle published in the Times of India can be accessed online at  http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/index.aspx?eid=31807&dt=20150807 on page 6

or at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/life-theatre-of-veenapani-stepping-out-of-the-known/articleshow/48384460.cms?from=mdr 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stepping out of the known : The theatre of Veenapani Chawla

by M.D.Muthukumaraswamy


      Veenapani Chawla’s last play The Hare and the Tortoise was the summation and pinnacle of her artistic works and the spiritual quest guided by Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy. In a theatrical production of stunning visual imageries, jazzy music, non-linear narrative, sparse dialogues, and multiple realities represented by the shadow puppets and human bodies Veenapani Chawla explored Hamlet’s dilemma, ‘to be or not to be’. The Aesop’s folktale of the slow moving tortoise winning the over confident hare in a race becomes a metaphor for dealing with space and time. Veenapani Chawla appropriately draws in her play parallels between the folktale and other archetypal pairs of Ganapathi- Karthikeya, Arjuna- Eakalyva, Alice in reality- Alice in wonderland, shadow- human body, and the modern man in the cut throat race and the ever brooding, procrastinating Hamlet. What look familiar and even ludicrous pop images soon assume the significance of a philosophical inquiry of the predicament of the modern man without a soul. Very interestingly The Hare and the Tortoise makes a case for stepping out of the familiar frame, going into the liminal zone, and getting into the mode of Meta soliloquy to grasp the problems of the modern man. The brooding Hamlet, played by Vinay Kumar, is disgusted with sex, food, drink and his own shadow and wonders whether the answers are there in the realms beyond knowledge. The playful Alice, played by Nimmy Raphel, assures him that it is a mystery and what follows is a series of movement and music explorations on the theme of getting out of the known frame.

      The delight and the charm of Veenapani Chawla’s plays emanate from her ways of dethroning the supremacy of the word in theatre and reestablishing the primacy of actor’s body as the artistic medium. Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy of integral yoga accords seminal importance to human body as the instrument of spiritual quest and Veenpani says in a conversation with Leela Gandhi, “We know our superficial personality which is made up of a body, mind, and emotions/ vital being. But behind this, hidden from us, is what he Sri Aurobindo calls the subliminal part, which is much vaster but not known to us. Our external personality constantly receives influences, touches, communications from this part but the external part does not know from where they are coming. Hidden behind the subliminal is the psychic, the evolving part of us. One of the important practices is to bring this part out in the open, to become conscious of it, to let it direct the life. All I will say about the psychic here is that it is the source of the finest creativity.” Translating this spiritual vision into an artistic practice Veenapani wrote that the artistic principles of the Adishakti Laboratory for Theatre Arts Research, a modern theatre company she founded near Auroville, Puduchery, were to seek out the subtle interconnectedness between disparate peoples, localities, knowledges.

      She further wrote, “Our work has been the consequence of dialogue between traditional performances and contemporary performance; between theatre practitioners and urban architects; between physics, philosophy and religions.; between Dalit performers and Sanskrit pundits; between Vedic chanting, Koranic chanting and Koodiyattam Vachika; between the needs of the contemporary actor’s body and the resources of traditional medicine; between music and the language of the stage; between music and Nada Yoga; between South Asian performance traditions and histories, and East Asian performance traditions and histories. Ardhanarishwara, the half-man, half-woman form of Siva, Ganapati, with his animal head and human body, resonate with the idea of ‘mixed’ space and strange marriages. It is with the creation and fostering of such paces that our aesthetic concerns itself, and offers itself to the world”

      While Veenapani’s plays Ganapati, Brhannala and The Hare and the Tortoise stand testimony to her artistic vision of hybridity in the postcolonial time, Shanta Gokhale in her edited volume, The Theatre of Veenapani Chawla Theory Practice Performance chronicles Veenapani’s life as a constant search for the subliminal part of Indian psyche which she found in Indian folk traditions. After successfully directing Naseeruddin Shah in a new interpretation of Oedipus Veenpanai left the glamorous world of Mumbai theatre to learn Chhau in Odisha, Kalaripayattu and Koodiyaatam in Kerala subsequently. After settling down in Puduchery and founding Adishakti Veenapani constantly hosted festivals, of Ramayana, shadow puppet theatre, Therukkoothu, Nagaiyar Koothu, and Koodiyaattam. In her constant artistic explorations of Indian folk traditions, Veenapani discovered the time-tested methods of breathing exercises and their relations to human emotions and perfected them in actor training methods. In a way like her characters in her plays, Veenpani constantly stepped out of the known frames of knowledge and reality to articulate a unique theatre, which is quintessentially Indian. In one of her characteristic  stepping out of known frames of knowledge and reality in November 2014 Veenapani Chwala left this world. What she has left behind at Adishakti is not only an intriguing body of plays and performances, but also unique method of actor training that connects one to the energy resources in the body and the cultural resources in the mind. Adishakti actors Aravind Rane, Vinay Kumar, Nimmy Raphel, and Suresh Kaliyath, and musicians Pascal Siegar and Arjun Shankar are the finest in the world of Indian theatre today.

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

The dark age of Ponniyin Selvan | Article published in the Times of India


The article can be accessed online at http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/index.aspx?eid=31807&dt=20150729 on Page 6


The dark age of Ponniyin Selvan

by M.D.Muthukumaraswamy


       There is a spine-chilling scene in Aru Ramanathan’s historical novel Veerapandian Manaivi (serialized in the magazine Kadhal from 1953 to 1959 and published as a novel in three parts in February 2012) which presented an artistic challenge to the pomp and glory of the Chola period (10th to 13th century) envisioned in Kalki Krishnamurthy’s Ponniyin Selvan. Set in the year 1180, Veerapandian Manaivi opens in the streets of Madurai with the description that among the heaps of corpses the Chola army had established its pillar of victory in the Pandiya kingdom. One of the hidden reasons of the war, we discover, was the Chola king Kulothunga Chola’s desire to capture Pandiya king Veerapandian’s second wife who was believed to be the most beautiful woman on earth. In a cruel campaign led by the Chola army Madurai was captured and the search was on to capture Veerapandian’s wife. The Chola army captured the fourteen-year-old son of Veerapandian and brought him to the open trial court. In a chapter peppered with the descriptions of intrigues, sycophancy, and competitions to claim laurels the Chola courtiers and army officers try the innocent boy to know the whereabouts of Veerapandian and his wife. The open trial is presided by the Chola stooge Vikrama Pandian, and when Jananathan, the Chola army general and the most mysterious character of the novel, insinuates the boy with references to the beauty of his stepmother, the boy spits on the face of Jananathan.   After allowing the boy to spit on his face for seven times, Jananathan makes a fiery speech in the court saying that the boy was not spitting on his face but on the tiger emblem of the Chola kingdom, and on the face of Kulothunga Chola himself. Infuriated by the speech a stooge army chieftain beheads the boy in the open court. The people riot and protest the killing of the boy, but the Chola courtiers flee and disappear into safety. (Page 208)

      The mass protests against the atrocities of the army officers and tax collectors were common during the Chola period and several historical inscriptions record such atrocities and protests. In an illuminating scholarly essay, “ Struggles for Rights during Later Chola Period” published in Social Scientist in 1974 M.D.Rajukumar details the mass protests against the Chola consolidation of caste hierarchy and agrarian taxes. Reading through all the stone inscriptions of the Chola period M.D.Rajukumar indisputably proves that the Cholas shifted the land owning to Brahmins,  Vellalas, temples, and devadasis and created a huge populace of landless labourers. The mass protests against the Brahmin-Vellala hegemony and the exorbitant taxes led to the collapse of the Chola Empire. Many Marxist scholars in Tamil have always maintained that the landless labourers of the Chola period were enslaved to construct the monumental temples and they stand today as testimony to the slavery of the Chola dark ages in Tamil history.

      Reading through the works of Nilakanda Sastry, and Sadasiva Pandarathar the same historians Kalki Krishnamurthy also read Aru Ramanathan was able to interpret the Chola period differently and debunk the Chola glory as false. In the chapter 104 of the novel Aru Ramanathan speaks through the character of Jananathan and justifies his interpretation of the Chola period. Jananathan says that the imperialist war campaigns of the Cholas were undertaken not for the expansion of the kingdom but for plundering the wealth of the neighboring states and bring women to enslave them as Devadasis in the temples. After war victories, Aru Ramanathan reasons, the Cholas never ruled the lands and instead brought the plundered wealth and women to the Tamil country. Even for the claim that that the Chola kings were the patrons of great poets like Kampan Aru Ramanathan says that Cholas brought Bihar Brahmins as temple priests and shunned Tamil from the precincts of the temples. Noted Tamil scholar A.S.Gnanasambandam in his book Periyapurana Araichi expresses a similar view that Sanskrit and Brahminical rituals were imposed upon the Tamil temples during the Chola period.


      Incidentally Aru Ramanathan uses passages from Kampan’s Ramayana as a kind of epitaph on every chapter of the novel to provide an ironic reading to the unfolding events of the novel.  Ramayana and Veerapandian Manaivi share similar plot structures in the sense that if in Ramayana Ravana abducts Rama’s wife Sita, in Veerapandian Manaivi Kulothunga Chola wages war against the Pandiya kingdom to imprison Veerapandian’s wife. Aru Ramanathan’s layering of the texts of his novel and Kampan’s Ramayana reveal the functions of an epic in building the polity of an imperialist nation state. If at all if we were to stage a play or make a film on the Chola period we should do that not with Ponniyin Selvan but with Veerapandian Manaivi. After all history reaches us as a heap of broken images and what we need are critiques and not glorifications.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

The seductive beauty of innocence: K.Muralidharan's new paintings | Article published in the Times of India






The article can be accessed online  at the Times of India epaper site http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/index.aspx?eid=31807&dt=20150722 on page 6















Andal by K. Muralidharan 


The seductive beauty of innocence:  K.Muralidharan’s new paintings

by M.D.Muthukumaraswamy


      Inside the tranquil Besant Nagar home studio of K.Muralidharan, his new modernist painting of the Vaishnavite poetess Andal startles you with its alluring beauty of a folk art.  On a closer look at the familiar features of Andal- the side hair bun, the parrot and the flower garland- you become aware of the rich texture of the painting. The armored body of Andal in geometrical shapes of black and white etches her body slightly forward against the lyricism of the Tamil alphabets in which Tiruppavai is written as if the canvas were a stone of inscriptions. The helplessness of her slender hands matches the dreamy big eyes and the mysterious half smile hidden behind her lips.   Masked in crimson a large peacock, miniature of a reclining Vishnu, Garuda, and numerous little creatures divine and natural share their colour with the flower in Andal’s hand. When you realize that behind the painting’s charm there lies a mastery of portraiture you begin to wonder whether the semblance of his works to folk arts is only a pretense. Muralidharan says in one his exhibition brochures, “ I wouldn’t call mine folk art, and it would be more appropriate to call it naïve art”.  The goddess Meenakshi painting shares several of the stylistic features of Andal but it appears to be more fantastic with Meenakshi’s wild Medusa like hairs, and the hands making the magical appearance from the masked universe of the crimson background.  Comparing the paintings of Andal and Meenakshi one would  discern that what Muralidharan calls his naiveté is actually an innocence with which he approaches his subjects, the popular images of religious folklore.

      Muralidharan’s present sets of paintings are in fact culmination of his long creative journey as a painter. In his very early works, immediately after his graduation from the college of arts and crafts in the late 1970s one can see his tendencies towards creating involved portraits and surfaces with rich textures. Muralidharan says that his shift in the choice of themes occurred in the mid 1980s when he was visiting Hampi. Sitting in the delicious ruins of Hampi, Muralidharan decided that the conversation between conservation of tradition and chronicle of change would be integral to his paintings. He found the inventory of his fantasies in his immediate environment and neighborhoods: the elephants of Thiruvallikeni temple, the qualities of the graphics of the Tamil alphabets, the idea that goddesses could be sitting on lotuses while  cows are wandering in the busy streets, and animals, birds, and humans coexist on the same plane. In Muralidharan’s paintings of the 1990s we see his impressionist portrayals of gods, goddesses, and elephants on flat surfaces that lend a surreal and dreamy qualities to his paintings. As years pass by Murlaidharan grows more innocent in his approach and in his paintings at the time of the turn of the millennium we see his works approximating popular imagination and providing us a chance to examine our traditional images. In Muralidhran’s paintings there is a grammar of patterning but the free visualization that defies logic, invites us to approach popular images and their associated cultural memories –Andal being a case in point- impressionistically, unconsciously and innocently to make them our own. Every decade seems to have added a layer of meaning and elegance to Muralidharan’s paintings and his accumulated learning is evident in his new paintings.

      The artistic achievement of Muralidharan’s present set of paintings is spectacular not only for himself but also for his methodological inheritance from the Madras school of art which set out to discover our cultural roots and their modernist expressions. Muralidharan’s folkloric motifs, and the images of popular religious folklore such as goddess Lakshmi, and Saraswati do not abandon the traditional decorative patterning but they reinvent them and reposition them. Another characteristic of Muralidharan’s paintings is that he does a series of paintings on the same subject. Whether it is an elephant or a Kamadhenu, Muralidharan presents a set of variations on the same theme, accentuating the play on our unconscious perceptions of them. Muralidharan’s paintings on the same theme present reconfigurations of familiar motifs resembling children’s play in its vivaciousness and virtuousness resulting in compositions of bright unconventional colours.   Muralidharan says, “ I also learnt that I must continue to evolve, continue to experiment, if I should be relevant and meaningful to the society, I live in. To me artistic achievement, success and being different is not a fixed point from where you can talk down to people. It is a state of flux and I am part of it”.  The good news is that K.Muralidharan’s Andal is a masterpiece.